The Daily Briefing – April 22, 2026

Washington Democrats’ millionaires tax saga just picked up a familiar subplot: who needs impartial courts when you can stack the deck ahead of time?

 

 

Conflict of Interest? Democrats Call It “Strategic Staffing”

As lawsuits pile up against the state’s shiny new 9.9% income tax, Republicans are raising alarms about Justice Colleen Melody—who may soon help decide the tax’s fate—having some awfully convenient connections. She was handpicked by Gov. Bob Ferguson after a glowing recommendation from Solicitor General Noah Purcell… the same guy whose office will be defending the tax in court.

Even better, Purcell wasn’t just offering friendly career advice—he was reportedly helping lawmakers figure out how to pass the tax in a way that dodges voter backlash and tees it up for a Supreme Court reconsideration of the state’s long-standing ban on income taxes. Efficient!

Now Republicans are asking the obvious question: should someone elevated by the very people defending the law—and backed financially by their colleagues—be ruling on it? State judicial conduct rules say recusal is appropriate when impartiality might “reasonably be questioned.” But in Olympia, that bar seems to be somewhere between “unlikely” and “don’t ask.”

Meanwhile, the Attorney General’s office insists everything is perfectly fine, noting Melody didn’t personally work on the tax issue. Which is comforting—if you ignore the part where the same political orbit keeps putting all the pieces in place.

With multiple Supreme Court seats up for election and the case likely headed there soon, the stakes are obvious. The only real question left: will the court look like a neutral referee—or just another extension of the same political playbook that passed the tax in the first place? Read more at Center Square.

Religious Freedom—Until Democrats Decide It’s Inconvenient

Eight Snohomish firefighters are now heading to the U.S. Supreme Court, asking a pretty basic question: do religious rights actually mean anything when government employers don’t like them?

During the pandemic, Snohomish Regional Fire & Rescue denied their vaccine exemptions—claiming it would create a hardship. No real proof required, just a “reasonable concern,” which in today’s bureaucratic language seems to mean because we said so.

Now their attorneys are pushing for a standard that sounds almost radical in 2026: if the government wants to deny a religious accommodation, it should have to show an actual problem—not just speculate one into existence.

And here’s where it gets awkward for the Democrats who cheered this kind of heavy-handed approach: the same department that insisted unvaccinated firefighters were too dangerous to work… quietly brought them back anyway. Still unvaccinated. No collapse of public safety. No catastrophe. Just a narrative that didn’t hold up.

Even better, while Snohomish was sidelining them without pay, other fire departments had no issue hiring these same firefighters—and even relied on them for mutual aid. So apparently they were “too risky” to work… except everywhere else they were needed.

The firefighters are now seeking back pay for months they were forced off the job, and more importantly, a ruling that could rein in a growing double standard: religious freedom in theory, but optional in practice.

Because if the government can deny your beliefs based on a guess, it’s not really a right—it’s a permission slip. Read more at Seattle Red.

Breathe Easy—Your Tax Dollars Went to Bike Workshops Instead

Back in 2024, former governor Jay Inslee warned of an “asthma epidemic” and pitched the state’s CO₂ tax as the fix. Fast forward, and the Department of Ecology handed out $8.5 million in “air quality” grants—only for it to turn into a masterclass in how not to reduce pollution.

Out of 21 projects funded, just one actually appears to meaningfully reduce air pollution. One.

So where did the rest of the money go? Not into cutting emissions—but into the usual political pet projects dressed up as “environmental justice”:

  • Funding advocacy groups to push legislation Democrats already support
  • Paying people $2,000 stipends to sit on advisory boards
  • Handing out refurbished bikes and teaching kids maintenance skills
  • Subsidizing e-bikes… with no evidence it reduces pollution

And the one idea that should have worked—replacing wood-burning stoves, a known pollution source—ended up replacing exactly zero. Turns out homeowners didn’t want them gone. Who could’ve guessed?

Meanwhile, the only project that actually did something useful—a Spokane effort reducing dust from an unpaved road—used real metrics, measured pollution reduction, and proved cost-effective. Naturally, that’s the kind of program lawmakers decided to cut funding for.

Yes, really. Even as Democrats insisted the CO₂ tax was about “health disparities,” legislation backed by Joe Fitzgibbonslashed future funding for the only projects that delivered actual environmental results.

What’s left is a program with no accountability, no performance standards, and no requirement to actually reduce pollution—just a lot of money changing hands while air quality stays the same.

Because in Olympia, solving the problem is optional. Funding the narrative is mandatory. Read more at the Washington Policy Center.

Out-of-State Cash, In-District Silence

In Washington’s 3rd Congressional District, Democrats are proving once again that “local representation” is more of a slogan than a practice. As Shift readers know, incumbent Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez pulled in a hefty $1.3 million this quarter—and only about 7.8% of that came from Washington state. 

Translation? The campaign may have a Washington zip code, but the funding has a strong East Coast accent.

Republican challenger John Braun, meanwhile, is leaning into the contrast—highlighting that most of his fundraising actually comes from within the state and the district he wants to represent. A novel concept: being backed by the people you’d serve.

Perez’s camp insists she’s fighting for “working people,” but the numbers tell a different story. When hundreds of thousands are flowing in from places like New York financiers, it raises a pretty obvious question—who exactly is she working for?

And then there’s the silence on Washington’s controversial new income tax. Braun says it’s one of the top issues voters bring up. Perez? Not much to say. Funny how that works when your political allies are the ones pushing it.

Democrats love to talk about grassroots campaigns—until the grass starts growing outside their donor base. Read more at Center Square.

Donate Now

Please consider making a contribution to ensure Shift continues to provide daily updates on the shenanigans of the liberal establishment. If you’d rather mail a check, you can send it to: Shift WA | PO Box 956 | Cle Elum, WA 98922

Forward this to a friend.  It helps us grow our community and serve you better.

You can also follow SHIFTWA on social media by liking us on Facebook and following us on Twitter.

If you feel we missed something that should be covered, email us at [email protected].

Share: