For the last five years, Washington State Democrats had one clear goal in mind: Use the McCleary education funding case as an excuse to pass new types of taxes. A state income tax, a capital gains income tax, a carbon tax – it hardly mattered. Democrats just didn’t want to “let a crisis go to waste.”
So by that standard, how did they do? They failed miserably – and that’s great news for the rest of us. Here’s a look at that hoped-for new taxes that will leave state Democrats humming “What Might Have Been.”
Capital gains income tax
Yes, just phrasing it that way ticks off a progressive. “It’s not an income tax!” they protest. But it would tax income made from capital gains, so…it’s a capital gains income tax.
House Democrats, who hold a mere 50-48 majority in that chamber, pushed for a capital gains income tax this year. By “pushed,” we mean they brought it up as an idea but never did anything about it, including vote for it.
They wanted Senate Republicans, who oppose a capital gains income tax, to cave and agree to it before they’d vote for their own proposal. Not surprisingly, this idea went nowhere.
Carbon tax
Gov. Jay Inslee threw his weight, as he has throughout his tenure, behind a carbon tax. Inslee has made it clear that a carbon tax is his #1 priority as governor.
What did legislative Democrats do with Inslee’s highest priority? They never brought it up for a vote.
Income tax
Washington State Democrats have long dreamed of enacting a state income tax. In fact, it’s an official plank in the party platform and has been for years.
Inslee has said he doesn’t support a state income tax. He always manages to answer the question, however, in a way that implies he merely accepts this as a political reality rather than actually opposing it.
A state income tax faces legal and constitutional hurdles, in addition to the political ones (i.e. it’s unpopular with voters). Efforts such as Olympia’s and Seattle’s local income tax proposals are meant to “blow up” court precedent and make way for state Democrats’ fondest wish.
So what did legislative Democrats do about it this year? They never voted on it.
Hey, we’re almost seeing a pattern here.
Were Democrats “rolled”?
Seattle Times columnist Danny Westneat wrote that legislative Democrats got “rolled” by Senate Republicans. He’s certainly right that legislative Republicans got more of what they wanted. “There is apparently no flimsier reed than a Democrat playing the game of chicken with a Republican,” he said.
On the big question of 2017 – how to pay for McCleary – Republicans won. For the taxpaying public, legislative Democrats’ almost total lack of success is great news. “Never waste a crisis” indeed.
Panama 1984 says
You have to be proud of our Senator she shines when she needs too most…..
Please all of you understand, Washington state has been kidnapped and held hostage by 3 counties in the Seattle area. The 2-senators and Governor and now the AG all only run for office in King,Snohomish, and Pierce Counties as they know they will not win anywhere else and that they only need to win in those three counties to carry the state. To H- – – with the rest of the state is what they say.
Brian L. says
You might lump the rest of the I-5 Corridor along with Kitsap County in there. Essentially you are right. There is a large number of Liberals living in that area. What we need is an electoral college for our state. That way there would be more representation by the rest of us.
Dick Muri says
Pierce County is essentially a 50/50 county! Our new Pierce County executive is a Republican. Pierce County Council has had a Republican majority since 2005. There are 8 state legislative districts in portions of Pierce County. Senate has 6 Republicans and 2 Democrats. House has 9 Republicans and 7 Democrats.
SMarieDavis says
There are only three counties in this state that vote these morons in. Wish they would bring the electoral college to state level – then there would be a level playing field.
Radio Randy says
All politicians (even union bosses) are excellent at weasel wording what they really mean.
I just read the contract from one of the many state employees unions, bragging up a whopping 6% cost of living increase over the next 2 year biennium (which begins July 1 and runs through June 30, rather than January 1 through December 31).
Lo and behold, year one gives a 2% increase. Year two gives another 2% increase, but wait…6 months into year two comes another 2% increase! So, if you do math, like me…it actually comes out to a 5% increase over the two year period. Remember…you are only getting the “third” 2% increase in the last 6 months…not the entire year. Yes, it does total a 6% increase from the end of the last biennium to the start of the new biennium, but it’s NOT 6% over the entire two year biennium…no matter HOW you slice it.
As you can see, I’m not addressing the issue(s) at hand…merely showing how politicians say something one way, yet do it another.